Brent Bozell, of the Media Research Center, posted an article on May 6, 2008 titled "Roseanne vs. Rush". "On April 28 she suggested leftists should ignite riots at the Democratic convention in Denver. 'We should, a bunch of us, go there and repeat the Democratic Convention from Chicago. Like, let's just cause a bunch of trouble!' There's even a leftist group called "Recreate 68" building up the rioting nostalgia." However, local news media accused Rush Limbaugh of inciting the riots. Even Democratic Senator Ken Salazar of Colorado bought into the left-wing media and sent an angry letter to Clear Channels radio asking them to reprimand Rush. Apparantly, even he can't stomach Rosanne or he would have known who really inciting the riot.

What is really striking is that the liberals would conduct such a violent protest of their own party's nominating conventions. Rosanne's suggestion that the liberals recreate the riots of '68 makes absolutely no sense. With her comment "Join us in the streets of Denver as we resist a two-party system that allows imperialism and racism to continue unrestrained", is she accusing the Democratic party of allowing unrestrained imperialism and racisom? (Considering Obama's candidacy and the left's fawning over him, the charge of racism is obvious.) Have the liberal's forgotten that Richard Nixon was elected in 1968, largely because the Democrats couldn't nominate an electable candidate?
 
While I'm all for abolishing the Democratic party, it only makes sense to attack your opponent; but then liberals were never known for being insightful. Also, the lefts' attack on Rush only proves their willful blindness to their party's dysfunctional schizophrenia.